Vakteye Logo
VAKTEYE
PRICINGABOUTCONTACTINSIGHTSCAREERS
Sign In
Back to Insights
COMPLIANCE

Swedish IMY's Cookie Guidance Explained

Vakteye Team/Nov 28, 2025/5 min read

In October 2024, IMY published its most detailed cookie guidance to date, clarifying expectations for consent management platforms (CMPs) and cookie implementations across Swedish websites. The guidance, while not legally binding in itself, reflects IMY's interpretation of the ePrivacy Directive as transposed into the Swedish Electronic Communications Act (LEK) and provides a roadmap for compliance.

The guidance establishes several key principles. First, consent must be obtained before any non-essential cookies are placed. This includes analytics cookies, marketing cookies, and any technology that accesses information stored on the user's device. Only cookies that are strictly necessary for a service explicitly requested by the user are exempt.

Second, the reject option must be as easy to find and use as the accept option. IMY explicitly states that consent banners requiring users to navigate through settings panels to reject cookies do not meet the standard for freely given consent. The authority recommends presenting accept and reject as equally prominent options on the first layer of any consent banner.

Third, IMY addresses the practice of cookie walls — conditioning access to a website on the user's consent to non-essential cookies. The guidance states that cookie walls generally do not produce valid consent, as consent given under such conditions cannot be considered freely given. There are narrow exceptions for paid alternatives, but the bar is high.

For organizations operating in Sweden, the practical implications are clear. Review your CMP configuration to ensure reject is as accessible as accept. Audit your cookie inventory to confirm that no non-essential cookies fire before consent is obtained. Document your lawful basis for each cookie category. And critically, test your implementation — IMY has stated that it uses automated tools to verify compliance, meaning theoretical compliance that breaks down in practice will be caught.

Are you at risk?

Get your free compliance report

We scan your site live and show you exactly which risks are exposed — before IMY finds them.

Book demo · free scan
Previous

CNAME cloaking and GDPR: how to find hidden trackers (with IMY-grade evidence)

Next

Cookie Consent Dark Patterns to Avoid

Related Articles

COMPLIANCE5 min read

IMY's Cookie Crackdown: What ATG, Aller Media & Warner Music Mean for You

In April 2025, IMY issued its first formal cookie banner decisions against three Swedish companies. The violations were textbook dark patterns, and your site probably has the same ones.

COMPLIANCE7 min read

NIS2 is here: Sweden's cybersecurity act since January 2026

Sweden's NIS2 implementation (Cybersäkerhetslagen) is live since January 15, 2026. No grace period. Here's what it requires and what happens if you ignore it.

COMPLIANCE6 min read

EDPB 2026: Why Transparency Enforcement Hits Swedish Businesses

The EDPB's 2026 coordinated enforcement focuses on transparency. Organizations should prepare for any 2026 EDPB coordinated enforcement framework by ensuring transparency mechanisms (Art 13/14 disclosures) are current and verifiable.

COMPANY

  • PRICING
  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT
  • INSIGHTS
  • info@vakteye.com

LEGAL

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • Data Rights (GDPR)
  • Security policy
  • Scanner identity
  • For visitors
Vakteye
VAKTEYE

Evidence ledger for GDPR, NIS2 and ePrivacy. Every finding tied to a statute and signed by an analyst.

Vakteye
Privacy VerifiedContinuously monitored by Vakteye

© 2026 Vakteye AB. All rights reserved.